Cloudera Developer Blog
Big Data best practices, how-to's, and internals from Cloudera Engineering and the community
More good news!
Thanks to Bill Podell, VP Big Data and BI Practice, MBI Solutions, for the guest post below.
Capacity planning has long been a critical component of successful implementations for production systems. Today, Big Data calls for a particularly deep understanding of capacity management – because resource utilization explodes as business users, analysts, and data scientists jump onboard to analyze and use newly found data. The resource impact can escalate very quickly, causing poor loading and or response times. The result is throwing more hardware at the issue without any understanding of what impact the new hardware will have on the current issue. Better yet, be proactive and know about the problem before the problem even occurs!
Organizing your data inside Hadoop doesn’t have to be hard — Kite SDK helps you try out new data configurations quickly in either HDFS or HBase.
Kite SDK is a Cloudera-sponsored open source project that makes it easier for you to build applications on top of Apache Hadoop. Its premise is that you shouldn’t need to know how Hadoop works to build your application on it, even though that’s an unfortunately common requirement today (because the Hadoop APIs are low-level; all you get is a filesystem and whatever else you can dream up — well, code up).
Spark 1.0 is its biggest release yet, with a list of new features for enterprise customers.
Congratulations to the Apache Spark community for today’s release of Spark 1.0, which includes contributions from more than 100 people (including Cloudera’s own Diana Carroll, Mark Grover, Ted Malaska, Sean Owen, Sandy Ryza, and Marcelo Vanzin). We think this release is an important milestone in the continuing rapid uptake of Spark by enterprises — which is supported by Cloudera via Cloudera Enterprise 5 — as a modern, general-purpose processing engine for Apache Hadoop.
A concise look at the differences between how Spark and MapReduce manage cluster resources under YARN
The most popular Apache YARN application after MapReduce itself is Apache Spark. At Cloudera, we have worked hard to stabilize Spark-on-YARN (SPARK-1101), and CDH 5.0.0 added support for Spark on YARN clusters.
Impala continues to demonstrate performance leadership compared to alternatives (by 950% or more), while providing greater query throughput and with a far smaller CPU footprint.
In our previous post from January 2014, we reported that Impala had achieved query performance over Apache Hadoop equivalent to that of an analytic DBMS over its own proprietary storage system. We believed this was an important milestone because Impala’s objective has been to support a high-quality BI experience on Hadoop data, not to produce a “faster Apache Hive.” An enterprise-quality BI experience requires low latency and high concurrency (among other things), so surpassing a well-known proprietary MPP DBMS in these areas was important evidence of progress.
In the past nine months, we’ve also all seen additional public validation that the original technical design for Hive, while effective for batch processing, was a dead-end for BI workloads. Recent examples have included the launch of Facebook’s Presto engine (Facebook was the inventor and world’s largest user of Hive), the emergence of Shark (Hive running on the Apache Spark DAG), and the “Stinger” initiative (Hive running on the Apache Tez [incubating] DAG).
Given the introduction of a number of new SQL-on-Hadoop implementations it seemed like a good time to do a roundup of the latest versions of each engine to see how they differ. We find that Impala maintains a significant performance advantage over the various other open source alternatives — ranging from 5x to 23x depending on the workload and the implementations that are compared. This advantage is due to some inherent design differences among the various systems, which we’ll explain below. Impala’s advantage is strongest for multi-user workloads, which arguably is the most relevant measure for users evaluating their options for BI use cases.
Using an appropriate network representation and the right tool set are the key factors in successfully merging structured and time-series data for analysis.
In Part 1 of this series, you took your first steps for using Apache Giraph, the highly scalable graph-processing system, alongside Apache Hadoop. In this installment, you’ll explore a general use case for analyzing time-dependent, Big Data graphs using data from multiple sources. You’ll learn how to generate random large graphs and small-world networks using Giraph – as well as play with several parameters to probe the limits of your cluster.
In its relatively short lifetime (co-founded by Twitter and Cloudera in July 2013), Parquet has already become the de facto standard for columnar storage of Apache Hadoop data — with native support in Impala, Apache Hive, Apache Pig, Apache Spark, MapReduce, Apache Tajo, Apache Drill, Apache Crunch, and Cascading (and forthcoming in Presto and Shark). Parquet adoption is also broad-based, with employees of the following companies (partial list) actively contributing:
Learn how HiveServer, Apache Sentry, and Impala help make Hadoop play nicely with BI tools when Kerberos is involved.
In 2010, I wrote a simple pair of blog entries outlining the general considerations behind using Apache Hadoop with BI tools. The Cloudera partner ecosystem has positively exploded since then, and the technology has matured as well. Today, if JDBC is involved, all the pieces needed to expose Hadoop data through familiar BI tools are available:
Learn how to convert your data to the Parquet columnar format to get big performance gains.
Using a columnar storage format for your data offers significant performance advantages for a large subset of real-world queries. (Click here for a great introduction.)